A shareholder’s payment does not by itself explain the increase in company funds: absent proof of its title and origin, the Italian Tax Office may treat it as unrecorded revenue. How to build the evidence before the money moves.
Article 46(1) of Presidential Decree no. 917 of 22 December 1986 (the Italian Income Tax Code) provides that sums paid to commercial companies by their shareholders are deemed loans unless the financial statements show that the payment was made on another basis. Under Article 45(2), this triggers a presumption of interest income for the shareholder, computed at the statutory rate where no rate is agreed in writing. That classification, however, does not prove where the funds came from.
In an audit, what is challenged is not the classification of the loan but the origin of the funds: Article 32(1)(2) of Presidential Decree 600/1973 makes bank movements usable as evidence, and assessment practice extends this to the personal accounts of shareholders in closely held companies. Absent proof of the payment’s title, the recovery as revenue rests on serious, precise and consistent presumptions (Article 39(1)(d)). Article 7(5-bis) of Legislative Decree 546/1992 places the burden of proving the alleged violations on the tax authorities; whether that rule also affects statutory presumptions remains disputed in case law.
In practice: the directors formalise the loan before the money is paid – a shareholders’ resolution or an instrument with a certified date stating amount, interest rate (or that the loan is interest-free) and maturity – and the shareholder pays by bank transfer from their own account. A draft assessment can be answered within the minimum sixty days allowed by Article 6-bis of Law 212/2000, attaching bank statements and proof of the origin of the funds.